https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=15809
--- Comment #14 from Jonathan Druart <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Marcel de Rooy from comment #13) > (In reply to Jonathan Druart from comment #12) > > (In reply to Galen Charlton from comment #10) > > > > I totally agree with the "what to do next" part, but what about now? My > > patch seems to match your requirements. > > Jonathan, I am reading: "I am not keen about monkey patching a core module", > which imo does not seem to translate to "match your requirements" :) Sorry, I thought Galen was talking about patching CGI (solution suggested on the ML). > I would not opt for a complete Koha::CGI at this point. But I would > (slightly) prefer the Koha::CGI::multi_param above "*CGI::multi_param = > \&CGI::param". It will make any developer immediately aware of our > "interception". The switchover to the real multi_param at some point in time > will be completely painless. > > Also note the different handling of the LIST_CONTEXT_WARN var. Is anyone ready to submit a counter-patch? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. _______________________________________________ Koha-bugs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
