https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=11081
Kyle M Hall <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |[email protected] --- Comment #30 from Kyle M Hall <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Tomás Cohen Arazi from comment #29) > (In reply to Brendan Gallagher from comment #28) > > (In reply to Tomás Cohen Arazi from comment #27) > > > (In reply to Chris Cormack from comment #26) > > > > (In reply to Jonathan Druart from comment #20) > > > > > After the discussion on bug 11190, I thought we all agreed that Moo > > > > > must be > > > > > used, instead of Moose. > > > > > > > > That was my understanding > > > > > > Same here. > > > > hmm... Should I revert this until it's not using the Moose? Thanks. > > I think so. My understanding was that we would not use Moose for CGI scripts as the startup cost is too high for Moose compared to Moo. However, we this is not a CGI script but a daemon, so the startup cost for using Moose is not a serious factor. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. _______________________________________________ Koha-bugs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
