https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=15883
--- Comment #6 from Owen Leonard <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Jonathan Druart from comment #5) > I'd prefer the contrary: update all existing occurrences of [% INCLUDE > 'doc-head-close.inc' %] with [% INCLUDE 'doc-head-close.old.inc' %] # > s/old/whatever That's fine with me. I wonder if the name of the "old" include should reflect the version? I'm concerned that we are going to end up with doc-head-close.old.inc, doc-head-close.older.inc, and doc-head-close.even-older.inc if newer jQuery upgrades start getting added before the last upgrade is complete! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. _______________________________________________ Koha-bugs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
