https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=16044
--- Comment #31 from Jacek Ablewicz <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Jonathan Druart from comment #24) > (In reply to Jacek Ablewicz from comment #17) > > 1) CGI + memcache - no measurable differences between patched/unpatched > > It certainly comes from bug 16088, don't you think? Very unlikely IMO, Bug 16088 is (mostly) plack-specific. I got no significant speed differences in 1) test above, because for L2 = memcached, two-level caching usually doesn't happen at all: the only place in the code when L1 gets ever populated is set_in_cache() subroutine. With L2 = memcached, set_in_cache() calls are (statistically) very rare - pretty much everything is fetched from L2, and L1 is left mostly unpopulated / hardly even populated, hence no performace differences. This issue got fixed in 1st followup from Jesse (now: 1st patch in separate Bug 16140). Relevant part of that patch (see comment #19), when applied on top of Bug 16044, enables two-level caching for L2 = memcached setups. If I do that, performance differences for CGI + memcached are immediately apparent ;) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. _______________________________________________ Koha-bugs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
