https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=10459
--- Comment #37 from Marc Véron <ve...@veron.ch> --- (In reply to Kyle M Hall from comment #35) > (In reply to Katrin Fischer from comment #33) > > It looks like we have a 'ton' of timestamp in the database. Apart from that > > there seems to be no existing other schema for timestamps columns that I > > could spot. I am not opposed to changing it - I think that's what Marcel > > wanted to do? > > Indeed! I think we should standardize on a single format. I think > "updated_on" for timestamps that are set on each update and "created_on" for > timestamps that are only set at the time of creation would be appropriate. > We could have a vote at the next dev meeting to formalize this ( or another > proposed format ) and add it to the coding guidelines. +1 for standardizing, "created_on", "updated_on" -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. _______________________________________________ Koha-bugs mailing list Koha-bugs@lists.koha-community.org http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
