https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=16441
--- Comment #5 from Marcel de Rooy <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Jonathan Druart from comment #4) > Because I have not found anywhere it's called many times. As I wrote > previously, I am not sure it'd be interesting to cache it, but I may be > wrong. > If we decide to cache it, we need to make sure the values in cache are > deleted when letters are updated/deleted. > Anyway it will be a much bigger patch and more an enhancement than a bugfix. Yes, it would be more work. But this patch affects performance. Note that I am not sure if this is actually a bugfix. The comment about regularly restarting plack is probably outdated. If we let each worker process only handle 50 requests, you do not need to restart plack very often. Since a new worker starts with an empty 'cache', you will not long see the old letter contents anymore. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. _______________________________________________ Koha-bugs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
