https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=11144
--- Comment #37 from Kyle M Hall <[email protected]> --- (In reply to M. Tompsett from comment #36) > From what I can read in these two patches, both generate the exact same > ordering. And while it doesn't necessarily match desired perfection, I think > they are an improvement. Do I need to sign off to get this to QA? Or is QA > still in discussion about whether we are going to process these like comment > 32 suggests? That is, push this to master, and open a new bug to work out > the error cases / situations that Katrin and/or others might be concerned > about. As far as I understand, my followup takes care of the error handling problem. If you'd be willing to test and sign off I think this can go back to Passed QA. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. _______________________________________________ Koha-bugs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
