https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=16579
--- Comment #42 from Jacek Ablewicz <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Kyle M Hall from comment #41) > (In reply to Nick Clemens from comment #40) > > I haven't fully tested, but initial read through and applying looks good. > > This makes it much easier to get memcached functioning with plack and is a > > good improvement > > I agree! This is a huge improvement and greatly simplifies the setup. > > Jacek, what do you think? I think generally it's good, and certainly good enough for the 'promotion' from "In discussion" to "Needs sign-off". I have some doubts re/ certain parts (mostly about an introduction of that 'namespace' thingy to the Koha caching system - not entirely sure if it's strictly necessary, and - in case it is - if doing it in this particular way is the best way possible). But it's more the matter of opinion / personal preferences (and/or my lack of understanding why it's needed to be done, and/or why in that way) than any real concerns. So far I haven't spotted any regressions in this patch set - looks like there may be some (= most likely very-very slight) performance hits involved for the caching system, because of the 'namespaces' introduction, but IMO sorting out inconsistencies of the memcached config / setups problems in the systemic way is _much_ more important then that. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. _______________________________________________ Koha-bugs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
