https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=16579
--- Comment #46 from Jonathan Druart <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Jacek Ablewicz from comment #42) > (In reply to Kyle M Hall from comment #41) > > (In reply to Nick Clemens from comment #40) > > > I haven't fully tested, but initial read through and applying looks good. > > > This makes it much easier to get memcached functioning with plack and is a > > > good improvement > > > > I agree! This is a huge improvement and greatly simplifies the setup. > > > > Jacek, what do you think? > > I think generally it's good, and certainly good enough for the 'promotion' > from "In discussion" to "Needs sign-off". I have some doubts re/ certain > parts (mostly about an introduction of that 'namespace' thingy to the Koha > caching system - not entirely sure if it's strictly necessary, and - in case > it is - if doing it in this particular way is the best way possible). I agree, that's why I have added to FIXME in the commit message since the first submission :) FIXME: There is an architecture problem here: the L1 cache should be defined in Koha::Cache All the patches have been splited into 3 bug reports. Letting this one for the general discussion about these patches. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. _______________________________________________ Koha-bugs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
