https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=17135
--- Comment #24 from Jacek Ablewicz <a...@biblos.pk.edu.pl> --- (In reply to Katrin Fischer from comment #17) > If we don't do 3) - would the fines still be calculated correctly? You mean 3.b part (correcting the dates in description)? IMO after Bug 15675 this shouldn't affect further fines calculation (no matter if this date stays as is or is optionally corrected). Post-Bug 15675, date in the description is not used in UpdateFine() for anything important any more. It still gets inserted to the description when new FU fine is created though, and because it's not modified on the possible overwrite, it may by useful for two goals: - pre-selecting the accountlines which may be non-accruing and still in a need of closing, - recovering the possibly overwritten fines (if any). If someone is inclined to do so (I'm not - we are not using 16.05 in production yet), automatic or semi-automatic recovery of the overwritten fines is quite possible IMO, with some extra time and effort (a lot of it, probably). If FinesLog is enabled: in ~100% of cases (?), if not - I guess this date can still be used at least to recreate the most recent overwrite of the given fine. The trouble with the optional 3.b part / date corrections is: it may make such theoretical recovery process more complicated or even (if the logs are absent) no longer possible. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. _______________________________________________ Koha-bugs mailing list Koha-bugs@lists.koha-community.org http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
