http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=7422
Paul Poulain <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|Failed QA |Signed Off --- Comment #10 from Paul Poulain <[email protected]> 2012-02-13 12:49:33 UTC --- (In reply to comment #8) > On the other hand, if I have a vendor like Erasmus BV and I am testing for > Erasmus, I would be happy if I at least would be warned for it. You now give > OK > for that situation since you only test exact equivalence. I disagree: atm, some libraries must create "similar" vendors, like "Erasmus books" and "Erasmus DVD" because Koha don't handle multiple VAT rates. In france, books have a VAT of 5.5% while DVDs have a 19.6% So libraries must create more than 1 "Erasmus" bookseller. There is another test case: networks with independantbranches, where 3 libraries can have different "Erasmus" booksellers because each of them has a separate contract, different contact,... So I think the test should just be strict. And the library that started with this topic wanted to addresse "strict" duplicate of vendors. Having "similar" checking is another topic imo (it's not a bad idea, but would address a different problem) Switching back to "signed-off", for Marcel to QA again. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes. _______________________________________________ Koha-bugs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
