https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=17189
--- Comment #4 from Jacek Ablewicz <a...@biblos.pk.edu.pl> --- (In reply to Jonathan Druart from comment #2) > We need to define several namespaces for our cache system. > For instance sysprefs, koha conf (koha-conf.xml) and unit tests > should be defined in a separate namespace. Hmm, IMO most serious limitation of this approach/implementation is that having separate cache object instances for 1) sysprefs 2) config and 3) everything else will result in opening 3 different connections to (the very same) memcached daemon per script/plack worker. Under plack, the 2nd connection will be used just once. IMO separate object instance (& connection) for sysprefs would have rather limited usability too > This will permit to > - and flush the sysprefs cache without flushing all other values because it will allow to flush only L1 syspref cache selectively, while no such thing would be possible for L2/upstream cache. Unfortunately, with memcached, it's either a flush of the given key or the whole cache flush (all keys in all namespaces & subnamespaces). In memcached, keys from different namespaces are not distinguishable in any way, and deleting keys by wildcard is not possible. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. _______________________________________________ Koha-bugs mailing list Koha-bugs@lists.koha-community.org http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
