http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=7303
Katrin Fischer <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |[email protected] --- Comment #2 from Katrin Fischer <[email protected]> 2012-02-16 12:21:58 UTC --- I wonder if this is a good idea? 1) The aqbudgets table already has a primary key (budget_id) as has aqbudgetperiods (budget_period_id). 2) We have a new feature in master to duplicate budgets and funds for a new year that I think is very useful and will probably be broken by this change. 3) I see no reason, why a library should be forced to rename their funds every year? I think having the fund names unique within a budget would make sense, but having them unique on database level seems not right to me. Where necessary budget and fund could be displayed together to make it possible to see which year/budget period the fund belonged to. 4) It's also currently not enforced, so what will happen on update? -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes. _______________________________________________ Koha-bugs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
