--- Comment #25 from Martin Renvoize <> ---
So.. I'm mostly OK with these patches.. but I have a related question:

What's the history around the continual regeneration of dbic result classes?  

My general understanding of dbic over the past couple of years is that
'dbicdump' is really about allowing a migration path from a non-dbic system to
a system with dbic classes. It's a one time thing, and then you should really
maintain the classes and instead generate the db changes from them as opposed
to the other way around.  If we did this, we could happily rename our resultset
and result classes and remove some of the code here that requires mapping from
::Object to ::Result classes.

Just something to bare in mind.  I could happily write a proof of concept for
such a trivial dbic ::Result object example should people be interested in

You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
Koha-bugs mailing list
website :
git :
bugs :

Reply via email to