https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=13760
--- Comment #8 from Marcel de Rooy <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Jacek Ablewicz from comment #6) > 700 $9 11 $a Son Goku $t Aaa Bbb > 700 $9 12 $a Vegeta $t Ddd Ccc > 700 $9 12 $a Vegeta $t Eee Fff > While having 2+ $9 links to the same > authority record from one biblio record is probably not very common > (depending on the material type, local cataloguing rules etc.), AFAIK this > can happen occasionally and in such cases it's not always necessarily an > error and/or a duplicate. Can anyone confirm that this case is a valid one with reference to cataloguing rules etc.? This discussion comes up actually on several of the reports in this category. Suppose that we would have a 'strict' merge mode and a 'loose' merge mode, that either removes all extra subfields or leaves them untouched in the biblio record while merging, would that be sufficient? See also the AuthCleanBiblios pref of bug 5572; I would btw rather call it something like AuthorityMergeMode. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. _______________________________________________ Koha-bugs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
