https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=16966

Marcel de Rooy <[email protected]> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|Signed Off                  |Passed QA

--- Comment #58 from Marcel de Rooy <[email protected]> ---
QA Comment:
Looks good to me. Added another follow-up.

No blocker, but just mentioning:
> To make sure all the conditions are met, the caller has the responsability to 
> call search_patrons_to_anonymise to filter the Koha::Patrons set.
I am not sure if this is the most ideal solution.
Koha::Patrons->anonymise_issue_history just does all records and ignores
privacy settings.
A parameter for patrons might be safer?

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
_______________________________________________
Koha-bugs mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs
website : http://www.koha-community.org/
git : http://git.koha-community.org/
bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/

Reply via email to