https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=18284
Olli-Antti Kivilahti <olli-antti.kivila...@jns.fi> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |olli-antti.kivila...@jns.fi --- Comment #6 from Olli-Antti Kivilahti <olli-antti.kivila...@jns.fi> --- (In reply to Martin Renvoize from comment #3) > I wish we flagged deleted rather than had deleted_* tables.. this sort of > thing would be far less fraught with dangers that way. > > I would also do this at the DBIC level personally.. with a monkeypatch of > the standard delete call. I kinda agree. Having two separate tables makes doing reports very very awkward. But I guess there would be a performance penalty of having 5 years of history in the biblioitems-table eh? After over two and a half years of service, our DB has 153569 deletedbiblio- and 1422962 biblio-rows. deletebiblio has no effect performance-wise. Martin I am 100% with you on this topic. Martin. Take a look at Bug 18265 and comment on what these cultural Marxists are about to do. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. _______________________________________________ Koha-bugs mailing list Koha-bugs@lists.koha-community.org http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/