https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=17964
--- Comment #18 from Jonathan Druart <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Marcel de Rooy from comment #17) > (In reply to Jonathan Druart from comment #16) > > (In reply to Jonathan Druart from comment #15) > > > (In reply to Marcel de Rooy from comment #13) > > > > In the interface I used this checkin notice: > > > > > > > > The following items have been checked in: > > > > ---- > > > > [% biblio.title %] [% old_issues.returndate %] > > > > [% old_issues.issue_id %] > > > > TT syntax uses old_checkouts. Take a look at unit tests. > > OK. Is that handy? Others might make the same mistake when converting a > notice? In any cases it's not introduced by this patchset. We discussed about that already and decided to use the "new" terminology. You should also take a look at bug 17981, I provide a very friendly way to automagically convert legacy syntax notices to the TT syntax. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. _______________________________________________ Koha-bugs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
