https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=11889
--- Comment #33 from Marcel de Rooy <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Christopher Brannon from comment #32) > I think this patch needs to focus on this topic as a whole and not as a > piece. I think we can't solve all issues on one report. So we have to agree on the goal we want to reach, but do it step by step. > Perhaps what can be done is to setup a button on the list to transfer > ownership. Would be a nice feature. > I think a superlibrarian should also have the ability to transfer, with the > same options, but they get the ability to chose any patron to send the > request to. Why exactly? The privacy discussion comes up here.. > Another approach for patrons being deleted with shared lists is to have the > disowned list be listed in a group of unowned shared lists. > Another question arises...does a shared list have to be owned? > If a list is shared or public, couldn't it remain unowned? The lists module has not really been designed that way. The option that I mentioned already a few times, is a compromize in this direction: create a fake staff user that owns all these lists; could be a pref. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. _______________________________________________ Koha-bugs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
