https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=12063
Marcel de Rooy <m.de.r...@rijksmuseum.nl> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|Signed Off |Passed QA --- Comment #86 from Marcel de Rooy <m.de.r...@rijksmuseum.nl> --- Final QA Comment: After a longer process, we reached Passed QA now. Added two small follow-ups. One serious problem in the db rev fixed. Still wanting to mention two points without triggering discussion again: [1] The construction around expirationdate still feels little bit unappropriate to me personally, but after some discussion we found a compromize. [2] The change in Letters.pm is still arguable. Previously, expirationdate was calculated here and could be used on a notice. Now, we do no longer need to calculate it theoretically. But take e.g. the hold slip; the notice is generated before the expiration date is set and therefore still empty. I recommend to have a look at this problem on a new report. I do not consider it as a blocker. Thanks, Alex. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. _______________________________________________ Koha-bugs mailing list Koha-bugs@lists.koha-community.org http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/