https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=17712
--- Comment #52 from Lari Taskula <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Benjamin Rokseth from comment #42) > Sorry to see you're so alone on this, as it sounds like a very good idea! I > will sign it off, though I have some concerns, particularly on performance. > > Passing koha objects around this way seems very javaish, and I don't really > see the point, if all you really need is foreign keys. > > But then again, its circumstantial, and could be remedied at a later stage > if needed. And it's a bit unfair on such a large codechange, which is > actually relatively easy to read and follow. Thanks for the support, new ideas, and the sign-off, Benjamin, and glad to hear from you! I found this a very challenging project and surely there is room for further performance improvements as well as other changes - under heavy pressure some of the choices made may have not been optimal. Follow-ups are welcome :) BTW, this is also under busy testing by our librarians and in the following days I'll have a desk-full of test reports and possibly follow-ups coming in for this Bug :) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. _______________________________________________ Koha-bugs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
