https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=18666

Jacek Ablewicz <[email protected]> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |[email protected]

--- Comment #2 from Jacek Ablewicz <[email protected]> ---
(In reply to Katrin Fischer from comment #0)
> The database update 16.06.00.028 fails with following error in an update
> from 3.22.19 to 16.11.08:
> 
> Attempting upgrade to 16.06.00.028 (Bug 17135) ...
> DBD::mysql::st execute failed: Unknown column 'me.no_auto_renewal_after' 
> in 'field list' [for Statement "SELECT `me`.`categorycode`, 
> `me`.`itemtype`, `me`.`restrictedtype`, `me`.`rentaldiscount`, 
> `me`.`reservecharge`, `me`.`fine`, `me`.`finedays`, 
> `me`.`maxsuspensiondays`, `me`.`firstremind`, `me`.`chargeperiod`, 
> `me`.`chargeperiod_charge_at`, `me`.`accountsent`, `me`.`chargename`, 
> `me`.`maxissueqty`, `me`.`maxonsiteissueqty`, `me`.`issuelength`, 
> `me`.`lengthunit`, `me`.`hardduedate`, `me`.`hardduedatecompare`, 
> `me`.`renewalsallowed`, `me`.`renewalperiod`, `me`.`norenewalbefore`, 
> `me`.`auto_renew`, `me`.`no_auto_renewal_after`, `me`.`reservesallowed`, 
> `me`.`holds_per_record`, `me`.`branchcode`, `me`.`overduefinescap`, 
> `me`.`cap_fine_to_replacement_price`, `me`.`onshelfholds`, 
> `me`.`opacitemholds`, `me`.`article_requests` FROM `issuingrules` `me` 
> WHERE ( ( `me`.`branchcode` = ? AND `me`.`categorycode` = ? AND 
> `me`.`itemtype` = ? ) )" with ParamValues: 0='XXX', 1='STUDENT', 
> 2='NORMAL'] at /usr/share/perl5/DBIx/Class/Storage/DBI.pm line 1832.
> 
> It's missing the column no_auto_renewal_after which is not present at this
> time in the database. It's added later on with update 16.06.00.046.
> 
> Could it be because the schema already has the column?

Yes, looks like it happens because during this particular upgrade step DBIx
schema is out of sync with the actual database structure, and CalcFine (after
Bug 17599 got pushed ?) is prone to fail because of that.

During upgrades from 16.05.03+ to 16.11.* or 17.05.*, there will be an attempt
to re-run the script from Bug 17135, and it will fail - but at least the
non-accruing FU fine records got already closed in earlier 16.05.03 upgrade
step, so this error should be (relatively) harmless.

Upgrades to 16.11+ from versions earlier than 16.05.03 are affected to a larger
extent by this issue - execution of the script will fail, some non-accruing FU
fines will remain unclosed, and they may get overwritten later on.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
You are the assignee for the bug.
_______________________________________________
Koha-bugs mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs
website : http://www.koha-community.org/
git : http://git.koha-community.org/
bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/

Reply via email to