https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=18755
--- Comment #7 from Marcel de Rooy <m.de.r...@rijksmuseum.nl> --- (In reply to Colin Campbell from comment #5) > (In reply to Marcel de Rooy from comment #4) > Patron status is a bit odd the CQ is like patron info in being an optional > field, but unlike patron info the AD password field is a required field so I > assume that a missing AD should provoke an invalid password in return. > basically the behaviour has remained unchanged. In practice I cant recall > seeing any kind of unit that uses patron status, I think when sip 2 was > released patron info effectively superceded it. So I think we should leave > functionality as is, just in case anything relies on the current behaviour. > ( I tested on a very old sip software before any of the patches affecting > patron info to confirm that behaviour hadnt been inadvertantly changed by > other patches) Clear enough. Thanks. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. _______________________________________________ Koha-bugs mailing list Koha-bugs@lists.koha-community.org http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
