https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=17967

Kyle M Hall <k...@bywatersolutions.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
  Attachment #63977|0                           |1
        is obsolete|                            |

--- Comment #4 from Kyle M Hall <k...@bywatersolutions.com> ---
Created attachment 65686
  -->
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/attachment.cgi?id=65686&action=edit
Bug 17967: TT syntax for notices - Prove that ODUE is compatible

Nothing new here, unless we are introducing a regression.
The items.fine is a trick of our historical syntax.
We need to provide a way to access this value from the a notice template
using the TT syntax.
A bug 17976 has been opened for discussion.

Test plan:
Define ODUE and OVERDUES_SLIP notice templates and use it to generate
overdue notices from the cronjob script (misc/cronjobs/overdue_notices.pl)
or the interface (members/print_overdues.pl).

You should be able to generate the same notices with and without using
the TT syntax

Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <k...@bywatersolutions.com>

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
_______________________________________________
Koha-bugs mailing list
Koha-bugs@lists.koha-community.org
http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs
website : http://www.koha-community.org/
git : http://git.koha-community.org/
bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/

Reply via email to