https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=12555
--- Comment #21 from Katrin Fischer <[email protected]> --- I think this is one of the places, where our split tables create problems again as there is no clean way of doing what I think would be right with FKs. Scenario: Items are created on order. Order is created with items, order is cancelled. The items are deleted. But what is next? 1) Items are moved to deleteditems Pro: - More information is kept. - Usual way of doing things in Koha. Contra: - If the aqorders_items link is removed, you won't be able to exclude these items from statistics effectively (no way to tell they never were in the library. This especially creates a problem for German libraries that have to keep an 'inventory book' - being able to tell when which item was bought and when it was removed from the library etc. 2) Items are really deleted Pro: - Items never really existed, deleting them makes sense. - They won't get counted for statistics. Contra: - Unusual as Koha usually moves to deleteditems. At the moment I think I'd prefer 2 as the ideal solution 1) with keeping the link seems not easily/cleanly achievable without merging our items tables. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. _______________________________________________ Koha-bugs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
