https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=19555
--- Comment #3 from Tomás Cohen Arazi <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Katrin Fischer from comment #2) > Hm, when we add the timestamp to the new table, wouldn't looking at that not > be enough? I think that would be easiest. > I think I saw on another bug that changes to items weren't reflected either. > Is this already fixed or could be fixed in one go with this here? biblio and biblioitems are both the same table, just splitted. When a bibliographic record is modified, the timestamp should be changed (no matter in which of the tables is). The problem might be that we are relying on the DB feature of updating the timestamp when the row is changed. Which doesn't happen when no mapping triggers a row change. Regarding items, the items timestamps should be checked if include_items is set. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes. _______________________________________________ Koha-bugs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
