https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=14769
--- Comment #12 from Marcel de Rooy <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Janusz Kaczmarek from comment #10) > Hello to all. To not open a new bug I would like to submit here a patch > that should fix this painful and far-too-long-still-not-resolved issue. The > proposed approach relies on authority records (which should be > correct--that's exactly why they are called 'authority' records). > Especially MARC 21 case, as stated by Zeno, is more complex, specially for > 6XX (2nd ind., $2 subfield etc.) > > To test -- have some authority recs. with different tags (eg. 100, 130, > 150), use them in biblio, especially in 6XX, 7XX (setting 2nd ind). > Have running indexer and proper value of AuthorityMergeLimit, i.e. not 0. > Then play with indicators in authorities. For MARC 21 auth used in 6XX > play also with 008/11 and 040 $f (if 008/11 set to 'z'). Have a look > at the results in biblio (see subfield $2 in MARC 21 6XX if 008/11 = z > and 040 $f defined). Hi Janusz Thx for submitting this proposal. It really looks interesting. Will need more time to have a closer look, but I am glad that we take a next step. Quick question: The patch is MARC21 oriented; what about the UNIMARC side ? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. _______________________________________________ Koha-bugs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
