https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=19826
--- Comment #24 from Tomás Cohen Arazi <tomasco...@gmail.com> --- (In reply to Jonathan Druart from comment #21) > (In reply to Julian Maurice from comment #18) > > (In reply to Jonathan Druart from comment #15) > > > Hum, so Koha::Acquisition::Vendor::Basket::Order? :) > > > > Please, no :) > > Not everything can be represented in a tree. > > Where do you place basket groups in this hierarchy ? It could be > > Koha::Acq::Vendor::Basketgroup::Basket, but not every basket belongs to a > > basketgroup. > > Also, there is a 1-n relationship between biblio and aqorders, but > > Koha::Biblio::Orders does not make much sense IMHO. > > > > If there was a vote, I'd vote for everything on one level > > Not everything, but I would prefer Koha::Acq::Budget[s] and > Koha::Acq::fund[s] too. > Setting to In Discussion to get more opinions. I don't really care, really. I've moved Fund(s).pm one level up, and marked PQA so Matthias can code the funds endpoint on top of this. Thanks! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. _______________________________________________ Koha-bugs mailing list Koha-bugs@lists.koha-community.org http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
