http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=7174
--- Comment #4 from Paul Poulain <[email protected]> --- (In reply to comment #3) > I don't believe that we should wed Koha to Plack as a Fast CGI tool anymore > than we should be wedded to MySQL as our database. If we aim to implement > PSGI as our standard, we'd have Koha working on Plack, FastCGI or mod_perl, > which would let the institution doing the hosting choose how to set up their > machines. That's a valid point. OTOH I think we must *highly* improve our authentification workflow (read: rewrite it completely ;-) ) So if we can find a solution for that ... > As for keeping CGI... I'm not sure whether we need to or not, if we've got a > good selection of PSGI options that can run on a wide range of hardware. So > long as the move away from CGI doesn't disenfranchise anyone running Koha on > an older or low-spec machine, I think it could be okay. well= I have absolutely no doubts that Koha+Plack will work *better* on low-spec machines than in CGI ! 1 thread, keep alive for 30 requests means, according to dobrika, 60MB On a low-spec machine, the number of Plack threads can be limited to 3 or 2 instead of 6, to reach a low memory consumption. (I don't count the plack itself here. Dobrika, if you can give us numbers... -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. _______________________________________________ Koha-bugs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
