https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=3777
--- Comment #13 from Katrin Fischer <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Jon Knight from comment #12) > I'm just trawling through old REOPENed cases and I see that the current > (17.05) borrower schema still has the inconsistencies in the addresses. As > this was reopened because it was proving to be an issue for some addresses > longer than 100 characters, is it worth just attacking just those fields to > make them all match the address versions? > > In other words make these field changes in the borrowers table schema: > > B_address mediumtext NOT NULL, > B_address2 text, > B_city mediumtext NOT NULL, > > and > > altcontactaddress1 mediumtext NOT NULL, > altcontactaddress2 text, > altcontactaddress3 mediumtext NOT NULL, I once tried to start a clean-up, but ended very confused. In your eample I think there is probably no reason that ...address2 should not be mediumtext not null too? One thing I encountered back then was that some types can't be using not null (iirc). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. You are the QA Contact for the bug. _______________________________________________ Koha-bugs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
