--- Comment #101 from Tomás Cohen Arazi <> ---
(In reply to Josef Moravec from comment #100)
> > 
> > 5) Use PUT /patrons/<borrowernumber> for a patron without borrowers
> >    flag. This should go into pending patron modification status and
> >    needs to be accepted by a librarian.
> > 
> This is not implemented, do we need this? Failed QA means I need an answer
> as this is in test plan and does not work. Otherwise looks good.

The patrons endpoint is finished on the follow-up bug. We kept this one to
preserve the original attribution. One of the things we did was removing that
complexity. We don't need it, we voted an RFC which is implemented on the other

> Also, I added small follow-up, and rebased again on current master (small
> conflict in Koha/


You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
Koha-bugs mailing list
website :
git :
bugs :

Reply via email to