https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=19966

--- Comment #9 from Tomás Cohen Arazi <tomasco...@gmail.com> ---
(In reply to Kyle M Hall from comment #8)
> (In reply to Jonathan Druart from comment #7)
> > Yes I thought about that, but it may be problematic as we do not necessarily
> > create the object for the notices only. So if we do it that way (when
> > creating it) we may need to fetch it twice.
> 
> I agree. I don't think we should have to fetch an object twice. I think the
> fact that you can set read_only but not unset it is sufficient. Basically,
> and object can be passed around the entire lifecycle of a script call, then
> be marked read_only at the end and passed to the template. 
> 
> The *other* option would be a new_from_object method that close the passed
> in object. Then you could have read_only be immutable and set on creation.

I agree with either option, but we still need a way to tell which methods
have/don't have side effects that should then be forbidden.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
_______________________________________________
Koha-bugs mailing list
Koha-bugs@lists.koha-community.org
http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs
website : http://www.koha-community.org/
git : http://git.koha-community.org/
bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/

Reply via email to