https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=19469
--- Comment #27 from Kyle M Hall <[email protected]> --- Thanks for the table data! It made fixing this up much easier. > 1. Last lines of the 2 blocks have the "lowest priority" icon, I would > expect only the first one (with priority=9) This is good and correct behavior. Any number of holds can be set to "lowest priority" at once. > 2. item-level_itypes=item and all of the items.itype=BK, why do I have the > item level holds in the "Any item type" block? Good idea! My new followup takes care of this. > 3. If I change one of the priority from x to 9 using the selects, nothing > happens (same issue if I change 9 to x). I've updated the javascript to work with the multiple tables. I decided to let it re-flow the priorities in the affected tables, but we could also simply leave the priorities as they are if we have split holds views. Either solution seem good and correct in its own way. I chose to re-flow to keep consistency with the current behavior. > I will continue to test when this will be fixed. > It is certainly better for the readability to squash the patches. If you would like to squash all the patches and re-upload them as one please do so! If you'd like me to do it instead just let me know! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. _______________________________________________ Koha-bugs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
