https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=9921
paxed <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |[email protected] --- Comment #58 from paxed <[email protected]> --- (In reply to emjhet from comment #57) > Like the 2013 thread starter and initial commentator, I believe MARC > designates the 001 field (Control Number) for use to uniquely identify a > bibliographic record. 001 alone does not guarantee uniqueness. 001 and 003 together should be globally unique. If 001 is changed, then 003 should be changed to match the org code of the system. You could have eg. 001 generated in your system (and 003 with your org code), and another (imported) record with 001 from another system and the 003 containing the org code of that other system. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. _______________________________________________ Koha-bugs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
