https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=20271
Martin Renvoize <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe | |.com --- Comment #101 from Martin Renvoize <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Marcel de Rooy from comment #86) > deleted_at should probably be better: deleted_on; we also have updated_on Not sure I agree with the logic here.. I would say the field within the patron (borrowers) table is misnamed rather than the other way around.. _on suggests date only precision whereas _at suggests a higher precision including time. As the field is a datetime/timestamp rather than a simple date I'd go with _at here personally. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. _______________________________________________ Koha-bugs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
