https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=9921
--- Comment #63 from [email protected] --- (In reply to Katrin Fischer from comment #62) > I understand, just trying to prevent you from doing something that might > break stuff (because people have gone there before). I can't tell you why > for Koha 999c was chosen in the beginning, but it's one of the things that > will need quite a bit of thinking if we wanted to change it now. > > I think here are patches around to make a plugin to set 001 individually. I > am using a variation of the stocknumberAV plugin in one of our libraries to > create numbers, but you have to trigger it and it doesn't move the number to > 035 as they only do original cataloguing. A catalouging plugin might be a > route to explore. Katrin -- Thank you so much for responding. I'm a cataloger among non-catalogers and I am just trying to make things as easy as possible for my co-workers while following standard guidelines for minimum level cataloging. Unless I have a plug-in for the 001 and permit it to be filled in with a click of the mouse, I will not be able to convince anyone to spend the time on it. Some of our libraries are completely one-"man" operations. Koha deviates in several significant ways from the ILS that I am accustom to, including not having a good way to run reports requesting specific MARC fields. Am I correct that I can run a report and find out how many records have a specific MARC field, but the only way to find out the content of the field in a report is to have the MARC field mapped to an authorized value? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. _______________________________________________ Koha-bugs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
