https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=14570
--- Comment #113 from Jonathan Druart <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Kyle M Hall from comment #96) > > d. IMPORTANT - Should not we finally keep these fields and force the > > guarantors to be existing patrons? We could have only 1 "contact" and > > several guarantors. It seems that it will simplify a lot the code (for > > instance Koha::Patron->guarantors would return Koha::Patrons, and > > Koha::Patron::Relationship[s] would stay simple Koha::Object[s]) > > I'm going to have to ruminate on this and find out what the sponsors > requirements are. I like how it would simplify the code, but it would also > provide limitations that have already been overcome in the current patch set. What did you finally decide? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. _______________________________________________ Koha-bugs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
