https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=20469

--- Comment #25 from Martin Renvoize <[email protected]> ---
This feels like it doesn't fit in either Koha::Items or Koha::Holds to me and
rather, as per my suggestion in bug 11983 comment 8
(https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=11983#c8) a
Koha::Article::Requests module should be factored out.. we currently have too
much business logic directly tied up in the model classes.

I don't really see this as a case for filter_by_x and filter_by_y methods
actually as the filter, in my opinion, doesn't fit the 'involving complex joins
and stuff' category.. rather it's a simple dbic query.

I would probably subclass the class most appropriate (Holds or Items.. I'm not
sure here) and add the special accessor there.

Does this sound sane/make sense or do you want me to attempt to create a
counter patch as example code?

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
_______________________________________________
Koha-bugs mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs
website : http://www.koha-community.org/
git : http://git.koha-community.org/
bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/

Reply via email to