https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=19893
--- Comment #102 from David Gustafsson <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Alex Arnaud from comment #99) > (In reply to David Gustafsson from comment #96) > > @Alex Arnaud I agree concaternation of subfields could be useful, but I ague > > that how this is done has to be defined in the mappings. If we concatenate > > all the subfields, many existing fields where concatenation is not desirable > > will be concaternated as a result. > > I think the mapping system was designed for that. I.e > > author: 700ba > # we get 700$a and 700$b concatenated > > And when concatenation is not wanted: > > author: 700b > author: 700a > # We get 700$a and 700$b in 2 different array elements In that case there are MANY mappings that are defined in the wrong way. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. _______________________________________________ Koha-bugs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
