https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=15529
Jonathan Druart <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |[email protected] | |ommunity.org --- Comment #35 from Jonathan Druart <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Martin Renvoize from comment #33) > Hmm.. on second thoughts I think this needs a bit more thought around how it > may need to handle the 'type' argument that can be passed to the script.. I > can see cases where one would want multiple runs of the script running side > by side with distinct caller options. > > I'll ponder that a little and perhaps add it as a qa followup. Yes I agree, we should have a more flexible and generic approach. We already handle similar race conditions for circulation notices (CHECKIN/OUT) in C4::Circulation::SendCirculationAlert The algorithm would be: Get the notices to send for each notice: start a transaction lock the table if the notice needs to be send (fetch the status): send the notice update the status release the lock commit the transaction else: # We certainly faced a race release the lock rollback # certainly useless as we did not modify anything -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. _______________________________________________ Koha-bugs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
