https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=21065
--- Comment #18 from Martin Renvoize <[email protected]> --- I think we should start using a more descriptive naming scheme for foreign keys.. instead of table_ibfk_int (where int is a running number) we should make them more descriptive and have table1_fk_table2.. or {tablename}_{columnname(s)}_{suffix} (as per postgres defaults perhaps).. that would mean in this case we could check for the old _1 key before deleting it and check for the new _table2 constraint before creating it. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. _______________________________________________ Koha-bugs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
