https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=21063
--- Comment #42 from Andrew Isherwood <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Josef Moravec from comment #37) > (In reply to Andrew Isherwood from comment #35) > > (In reply to Josef Moravec from comment #33) > > > Also, why to have three columns for patron identity? > > > We had different customers asking for different fields (for sorting and > > filtering), so it was easiest just to include all three, then they can be > > turned on or off as needed > > I don't like this, it makes inconsistancy in system, we should use standard > pattern here: Firstname Surname (cardnumber) with link to moremember.pl. > Ideally generated by patron-title.inc template. I think this raises a bigger question of whether the current convention of Firstname Surname (cardnumber) addresses users' requirements. In our experience here, it doesn't. I think it's maybe worth having a separate discussion of whether we should be reconsidering the current situation and whether we should be making other DataTable instances in line with what we have here. I think it's certainly worth at least discussing. Which does beg the question of what we do to achieve PQA on this bug. We don't want it to be dependent on a potentially far reaching discussion. Do you think we should keep it as is, pending the discussion, or make it consistent with elsewhere, then address as appropriate following the discussion? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. _______________________________________________ Koha-bugs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
