https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=20664
Marcel de Rooy <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|Signed Off |In Discussion --- Comment #84 from Marcel de Rooy <[email protected]> --- + # This is so much faster than using Koha::Items->search that it makes sense even if it's ugly. + my $query = 'SELECT * FROM items WHERE biblionumber = ?'; Patch still applies. If I am reading thru the comments above, the main point of discussion is now: Do we want to return to raw sql in the above lines? It is rather obvious that this is faster than Koha::Object/DBIx. But we made a choice for DBIx and are still wrestling to implement it in the codebase. What would be the decisive reason for making the exception here, and would it be a precedent for doing similar things elsewhere? Also note that although the test plan refers to verifying that things are faster, I do not see any benchmark figures on the report. Moving to discussion and sending mail to QA. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. _______________________________________________ Koha-bugs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
