https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=11529
--- Comment #113 from Katrin Fischer <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Ere Maijala from comment #112) > I mean you could map 245n and 245p to the biblio.subtitle field in the MARC > framework, but since these changes introduce the biblio.part_name and > biblio.part_number fields, it makes sense to actually bring them into the > templates. I am not sure that would work in the expected way - it would not make all the information go into the field, but I think only one of it. I haven't tested, but that's how I remember behaviour for mapping both 260/264. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. _______________________________________________ Koha-bugs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
