https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=20310

--- Comment #30 from Martin Renvoize <[email protected]> ---
(In reply to Martin Renvoize from comment #28)
> I'm not entirely happy that this is built to only work with biblionumbers in
> reality.
> 
> I think it would be significantly more adaptable in the future if we add a
> field to the database that maps the combination of 003 + 001 into an indexed
> unique field and did the find against that.  That would mean that if your
> library happens to maintain 001 = biblionumber (as is the assumption here I
> believe) it'll all still work, but it will also work if your library uses
> local 001's or remote 001 and 003's.  It'll likely need tweaking as we learn
> of other schemes but that feels the most forward thinking approach I can
> come up with.
> 
> Thoughts?

That, or use the search engine to find hosts which is how the xslt's currently
do it I believe

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
_______________________________________________
Koha-bugs mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs
website : http://www.koha-community.org/
git : http://git.koha-community.org/
bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/

Reply via email to