https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=22284
Liz Rea <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|Needs Signoff |In Discussion --- Comment #103 from Liz Rea <[email protected]> --- Alright, thanks Agustin for helping me get these patches to apply! Have gotten through a bit of testing and I have some questions about the feature generally. A note: I've attached the set of MARC records that I usually supplement my devbox with, just so we are looking at the same things. Import them using the Stage MARC for import tool. :) my groups: North: Centerville, Fairfield, Franklin South: Springfield, Troy, Union The other libraries are not in a group, they stand alone. Test, opac: Biblio: De Crasi Aristophea. Dissertatio - 3 items, Centerville, Fairview, Midway Patron: Nicole Schneider, Franklin Pickup locations seen: Fairview, Centerville, Fairfield, Franklin Seems OK? Except maybe Fairview, as it isn't in the patron's group. Biblio: The Vixens, A novel. 1 item, Midway Patron: Nicole Schneider, Franklin Pickup locations seen: Midway Hm. Why not the libraries in Nicole's group (Centerville, Fairfield, Franklin) Biblio: Gairm, 1 item, Centerville Patron: Nicole Schneider, Franklin Pickup locations seen: Centerville, Fairfield, Franklin This seems right - pick up locations in the patron's group, but it is also the item's group. Biblio: De Crasi Aristophea. Dissertatio - 3 items, Centerville, Fairview, Midway Patron: Henry Acevedo, Midway Pickup locations seen: Midway, Fairview, Centerville, Fairfield, Franklin Logic (I think? can you confirm?): Midway because it is the patron's home library. Fairview because there is an item from Fairview? Centerville, Fairfield, Franklin, in a hold group, however our patron is not in this hold group? Is this right? Biblio: The Vixens, A novel. 1 item, Midway Patron: Henry Acevedo, Midway Pickup locations seen: Midway Thoughts: Midway is not in a group. It's like an individual branch is a group unto itself? Is that correct behaviour? Biblio: Gairm, 1 item, Centerville Patron: Henry Acevedo, Midway Pickup locations seen: Centerville, Fairfield, Franklin Thoughts: The patron is not in this group, I don't understand why we are using the item's group and not the patron's group? The main question I have is, which is the location that defines which group the reserve can be picked up in, the patron's branch (which is what I believe the intent of the feature request was) or the item's homebranch? If someone from VOKAL could comment on what they are expecting in the above scenarios, I think that would be really helpful. I'm going to stop here for now, as I think this question of which location is canonical is quite core to this dev. Liz -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. _______________________________________________ Koha-bugs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
