https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=19288
Katrin Fischer <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|Signed Off |In Discussion --- Comment #10 from Katrin Fischer <[email protected]> --- I am not sure here if less information is better. Maybe the original message should just be phrased a bit better? We switch from: Item-level hold (placed 05/11/2019) for delivery at Centerville. Hold for: katrin koha (42) To: There is a hold on this item I am also not sure how this related to the initial bug report, where Kelly reported that sometimes the item level hold would be filled first, even if not first in the queue. Can you explain? While the first message is very 'talkative', maybe we can find some middle ground? Something like: Item-level hold for .... (priority x) (similar to how we display the priority in the OPAC) And I would leave out the hold placed and pickup location. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. _______________________________________________ Koha-bugs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
