https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=21946
Katrin Fischer <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|Signed Off |In Discussion CC| |[email protected] --- Comment #43 from Katrin Fischer <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Nick Clemens from comment #42) > (In reply to Jonathan Druart from comment #41) > > Forget that, I had the new version in mind (NULL in DB instead of '*'). > > At some point we really will need it (bug 15522) in I think, we will need to > > stop building stuffs that will conflict with it. > > Why not implement on top of it instead? > > I think that will need work at this point. > > I believe the idea was to take care of the architecture, make sure it comes > out as we planned without any great changes in structure during QA etc. Then > work on the interface. I understand Joubu's point of view. We started moving from issuingrules to circulation rules following what I think BWS has started. But at the same time we keep adding to issuingrules... that's not good. I think we need to decide which way to go, otherwise we will create conflicts and waste developer time. The patch set is quite heavy, only have one comment so far: Could we use parent_itemtype or parent_itype instead of parent_type? I think it could get confusing fast especially if we want to introduce similar in other spots. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. _______________________________________________ Koha-bugs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
