http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=6557
--- Comment #27 from Jared Camins-Esakov <[email protected]> --- (In reply to comment #26) > (In reply to comment #24) > > The FAUSP (Fighters Against Useless SysPrefs) commitee > I recently saw this patch removing a pref :-) > http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=8263 > > (In reply to comment #25) > > Although I consider the performance hit to be significant > Could you make this more concrete? Did you test the difference in > performance? Instead of just mentioning some milliseconds on a specific > server, could we come to a reasonably accurate percentage or so? > If the performance increase would be below say 10%, we may not need two > ways. But we probably do if we reach 50%? As I recall, the performance hit was around 30%. Reducing the performance hit at the cost of clean code separation is -- as I discussed with Ian -- not a good idea, because it would make maintenance a nightmare, and move us one step closer to C4::Search levels of mess. I would say that the syspref would be a candidate for future removal, once DOM has entirely replaced GRS-1 (can we hope this will be true for 3.14? Well, maybe 3.16), but I am not comfortable with adding a feature that legacy libraries will be unable to take advantage of (instant popularity updates). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. _______________________________________________ Koha-bugs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
