https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=21932
Katrin Fischer <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |[email protected] Status|NEW |RESOLVED Version|17.05 |master Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE --- Comment #3 from Katrin Fischer <[email protected]> --- Hi Christopher, partly good news here: The issue about reverting a hold to the right type (item-level, biblio-level) has been resolved: bug 9834 I'll mark this as duplicate of bug 21729, which discusses the remaining issue with the double-use of expirationdate. I agree with you that the right fix would be a separate database field in reserves and old_reserves. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 21729 *** -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes. _______________________________________________ Koha-bugs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
